<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>USWeb - Latest Comments in How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://usweb.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://usweb.disqus.com/how_many_links_per_page_is_best_for_google/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:38:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-12532277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to be professional about&lt;a href="http://www.gifico.com/news/louis-vuitton-outlet.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;louis vuitton&lt;/a&gt;, can you advise where to buy real &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gifico.com/articles/Louis-Vuitton-Handbags.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;louis vuitton handbags&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louisvuitton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:38:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-12466098</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great PageRank article. Thank you for sharing your ideas on Google's Matt Cutt.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's interesting that you'll notice these websites have a natural amount of traffic from people who already know of them through Branding. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;High page rank makes sense because Google uses web traffic in its algorithms to give value. However, a non-branded website that is trying to enhance its search engine optimization-seo to rank on Google's search engine results pages-serp can rank without high PageRank value.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, the homepage of a website that has no external web marketing will only drive web traffic through search engine rankings. This kind of a site should be careful about their links and where they point to.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, what you are saying is that if you have 10 links, each one will get more ranking juice value than 30 links will because it is divided among the total?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Notwithstanding including a NoFollow of course. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Search Engine Marketing CEO</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-12333171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like to keep it under 100 even though Google can now easily do 400- 500 links per page....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lingerie</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:53:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-12189995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hello,your blog is interesting.&lt;br&gt;welcome to my page!&lt;br&gt;---&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bestguccishoes.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Gucci Shoes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wmbags.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Louis Vuitton Store&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tiffanysale.co.uk/discount-tiffany-rings-5.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tiffany rings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.louisvuittonfr.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Louis Vuitton&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.handbagon.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Louis Vuitton Handbag&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.uktiffanyjewellery.co.uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;Tiffany jewellery&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">happyeveryday</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-11723708</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another key facet to this is how many links are point at your site.  If HuffingtonPost has tons of links point out my guess is they have ten of thousands of links pointing in&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">authorityseo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:17:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-11055856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never add anymore than 50 links per page, but that's just me!   &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:46:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-11039004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds good! Thanks for sharing it!&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.louboutinsales.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; Christian Louboutin shoes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Try treating yourself on &lt;a href="http://www.louboutinsales.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; our store &lt;/a&gt; to see if any items interest you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David2009</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-10681138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;this post gets me to thinking I might need to update a couple of my sites and add the no follow attribute so all the juice isnt getting sucked out. Until I get a lot more links like im sure Huffington post does its probably a good idea to use no follow where it makes sense&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Affordable seo chicago</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:03:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-9369547</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the information. This topic came up recently when I was discussing a web page with over 600 links. My boss Arnie Kuenn found this post and referred me to it for back up of his recommendation to keep links at 100.  After reading this it all makes perfect sense!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris von Nieda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-8479356</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes this is the function that will possible for all user, to get the information quickly &amp;amp; correctly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Buy IBP</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:52:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Many Links Per Page Is Best for Google?</title><link>http://blog.usweb.com/archives/how-many-links-per-page-is-best-for-google/#comment-7166812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting, the 400-500 range seems normal in the mass media or publication space.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Search Engine Optimization</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:21:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
